Fortunately, Renault has a non-detachable, highly sensitive stabilization control.Ĭan you count on comfort? Theoretically yes, because the suspension is soft, but due to the lack of harmony on large bumps at higher speeds, it is also not comfortable. It is dissonant and does not provide good driving characteristics. In our opinion, one of the biggest disadvantages of this car is the suspension, of course it is about driving, not operating. It is also difficult to understand in some versions the lack of space for two cups for the front passengers. It is worth adding here that the poorest versions of Megane did not have a digital speedometer. Sometimes the fuel depletes surprisingly slowly, other times unexpectedly fast. Only the digital fuel gauge is hard to understand. Many people criticize them for the inclination and digital speedometer, but I personally like it very much in every respect. The dashboard has a rather specific shape and you can like it, and the set of clocks evokes mixed feelings. The low one can be found at the front on the dashboard and the panels as well as the central tunnel. The quality of workmanship in this area is not low, and even embarrassing. The couch can be folded twice by folding the seats first, then the backrests.Īnd during these activities, you notice the biggest difference between Renault and the competition. However, the size does not reflect the size of the Megane trunk, especially the hatchback and especially in terms of its width. Only Fluence beats everyone with 530 liters of capacity. The 5-door hatchback has a capacity of 372–377 liters (depending on source), while the estate has 486 liters. However, the trunks of both versions do not leave much to be desired. This is why the hatchback is not the champion of rear seat spaciousness, and the Grandtour is a strong fighter in this respect, but the strongest Fluence remains the strongest. It has a wheelbase of 271 cm, which is 7 cm more than the hatchback, and of course longer body. The Grandtour station wagon, on the other hand, is significantly larger.
Hatchbacks do not differ in size, but only in the width of the doors and the body in the rear part. Later, a convertible and a sedan with a slightly different design and the name Fluence appeared. The car was offered as a 5-door hatchback from the outset, and a year later a station wagon and a Coupé, which were essentially a 3-door hatchback, joined the offer. Renault Megane MK3 Characteristics and construction Is it worth For Buying Renault Megane MK3?.Renault Megane MK3 Operating costs, pricing and parts availability.What’s Common Fault on Renault Megane MK3?.Renault Megane MK3 Characteristics and construction.Read Also: Is Renault Megane MK2 1.5 dCi (2002-2008) a Reliable Car? It is true that the newer Renault models can still suffer from electronic faults and still have poorly made interiors, but mechanically they are extremely successful cars. The reason is mainly the brand, which is stereotypically associated as unreliable. Price is also an asset for used cars, which depreciate more than their German or Japanese competitors. Currently, it is offered with one of the two engines and costs a minimum of $14800. I still argue that as a new car, only price and equipment can defend it, and Renault still offers this car, which is still waiting for a successor. Rejected for the work of the chassis and not too spacious cabin, as well as the quality of materials and workmanship, it defended itself only with the price and large spaciousness of the station wagon. The Renault Megane presented in 2008 is a model that in the compact class has always struggled to take a leading position in car tests.
0 kommentar(er)
